Campus Crusade for Christ Becoming “Cru”

Last week, Campus Crusade for Christ announced they are changing their name in 2012 to “Cru”. From their website:

2. Why did Campus Crusade for Christ change its name? Our name presented obstacles to our mission. The word “campus” does not adequately represent all our ministries in the United States and confuses our constituency as well as potential partners. The word “crusade”-while common and acceptable in 1951 when we were founded-now carries negative associations. It acts as a barrier to the very people that we want to connect with. It’s also a hindrance to many Christians who would like to partner with us but find the word Crusade offensive.

10. Why did we take the name “Christ” out of our name? We were not trying to eliminate the word Christ from our name. We were looking for a name that would most effectively serve our mission and help us take the gospel to the world. Our mission has not changed. Cru enables us to have discussions about Christ with people who might initially be turned off by a more overtly Christian name.

I have read the information at their website, and the text of interviews with Campus Crusade for Christ representatives, and they keep repeating: “this is not about political correctness”; “twenty percent of the people willing to consider the gospel are less interested in talking with us after they hear the name”; “our ministry remains the same”.

They are upset that people (like myself) are calling them out for putting political correctness ahead of proclaiming Christ, but everything I’ve read about the purpose of the name change screams “political correctness”. Their reasons for removing the name of Christ make no sense. If your purpose is to proclaim Jesus Christ and Him crucified and resurrected, then come right out and say so. Hiding behind a word that has no meaning (cru) to the vast majority of people on this planet so as not to offend anyone is political correctness at its worst.

There is a Greek word “scandalon” (the origin of our word scandalous) that is defined as that which gives offense or causes revulsion, that which arouses opposition, an object of anger or disapproval. In I Peter 2:4-8, Jesus is described as the cornerstone (capstone) and is precious to those who believe, but to those who do not believe He is the stone that causes them to stumble and fall.

Michael Card wrote a song called Scandalon (emphasis is mine):

It seems today the Scandalon offends no one at all
The image we present can be stepped over
Could it be that we are like the others long ago
Will we ever learn that all who come must stumble

He will be the truth that will offend them one and all
A stone that makes men stumble
And a rock that makes them fall
Many will be broken so that He can make them whole
And many will be crushed and lose their own soul

In some of the interviews with Campus Crusade for Christ, they have said “We believe Jesus is the most attractive person in history, so we don’t need to force him on people”. The Gospel of Christ – His death on the cross to pay for all of our sin and His resurrection from the dead is not attractive, nor is it pleasant or easy to admit our own depravity, helplessness, and our need for the Savior.

Campus Crusade for Christ is doing a lot of spinning regarding their name change, but their reasons and justifications do not align with the Bible. Unfortunately it appears they are presenting an image that can be “stepped over” instead of presenting Christ as

… the truth that will offend them one and all
A stone that makes men stumble
And a rock that makes them fall
Many will be broken so that He can make them whole
And many will be crushed and lose their own soul

Even most non-Christians would easily identify what “Campus Crusade for Christ” represents, but the word “cru” is meaningless. To me this appears like another Christian organization that is watering down the Gospel of Christ in the interest of feel-good inclusion and political correctness.

OneMom